Part AEarthquake Depth and Magnitude
About this dataset
Twenty-three earthquakes recorded at tectonic plate boundaries, sorted into three depth groups. This is a teaching dataset: the values are representative of real subduction-zone patterns rather than a direct extract from one earthquake catalogue.
Selected earthquakes by location, depth, magnitude, and plate boundary type
| Location | Depth (km) | Magnitude | Plate Boundary Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Japan Trench | 35 | 7.1 | Convergent |
| Chile Subduction | 125 | 6.2 | Convergent |
| Mid-Atlantic Ridge | 10 | 5.8 | Divergent |
| San Andreas | 15 | 6.4 | Transform |
| Tonga Trench | 580 | 5.2 | Convergent |
| Peru-Chile | 200 | 5.9 | Convergent |
Build Your CER Argument
Write your answers in the CLAIM, EVIDENCE, and REASONING boxes on Part A of your worksheet.
Claim
State your answer to the question in one clear sentence.
Evidence
Give at least 3 specific data points from the graph. Include the actual depth and magnitude values.
Reasoning
Explain the plate tectonic principles that account for this pattern.
Background
Earthquakes happen when rock breaks and slips along a fault. How strong the earthquake is depends on how much rock breaks at one time.
At a subduction zone, one plate slides down underneath another. The deeper that rock goes, the hotter it gets and the harder it is squeezed.
Cold rock near the surface is brittle. Brittle means it snaps, like a dry stick. Stress builds up for years, then a large block breaks all at once.
Hot rock deep down is ductile. Ductile means it bends and flows slowly, like warm taffy. Rock that bends does not store as much stress, so when it finally does break, a smaller block moves.
Think about it: if deep rock can only break in smaller pieces, what does that do to the largest magnitude you would expect to find down there?
Part BGlobal Temperature Trends
About this dataset
Global temperature anomaly from 1880 to 2024, based on the NASA GISS Surface Temperature Analysis. An anomaly is how far the temperature sits above or below the 1951–1980 average, not the temperature itself.
Global temperature anomaly relative to the 1951–1980 average, with the rate of change since the previous row
| Year | Temperature Anomaly (°C) | Rate of Change (°C/decade) |
|---|---|---|
| 1880 | −0.20 | — |
| 1900 | −0.15 | +0.025 |
| 1920 | −0.27 | −0.060 |
| 1940 | +0.12 | +0.195 |
| 1960 | −0.03 | −0.075 |
| 1980 | +0.26 | +0.145 |
| 2000 | +0.42 | +0.080 |
| 2010 | +0.72 | +0.300 |
| 2020 | +1.01 | +0.290 |
| 2024 | +1.24 | +0.575 |
Formulas for Part B
- Total Change
- Total Change = Final Value − Initial Value
- Rate of Change
- Rate of Change = (Final Value − Initial Value) ÷ Time Period (in decades)
Build Your CER Argument
Write your answers in the CLAIM, EVIDENCE, and REASONING boxes on Part B of your worksheet.
Claim
State the temperature trend you observe in one clear sentence.
Evidence
Include specific temperature values and time periods. Calculate at least one rate of change.
Reasoning
Explain the greenhouse effect and how human activities influence global temperature.
Background
Energy from the Sun arrives mostly as visible light. That light passes through the atmosphere and warms Earth's surface.
Earth then sends energy back out, but as infrared — heat energy you can feel but not see.
Some gases in the air absorb that outgoing heat and send part of it back down. These are called greenhouse gases. The main ones are carbon dioxide (CO2), water vapor, and methane.
This is normal and necessary. Without any greenhouse gases at all, Earth's average temperature would be far below freezing.
What has changed is the amount. Burning coal, oil, and natural gas releases extra CO2. More CO2 means more outgoing heat gets absorbed instead of escaping, so the average temperature goes up.
Think about it: the table shows temperature going up and down before 1940, then climbing steadily after 1960. What changed?
Part CSea Level Rise Analysis
About this dataset
Satellite measurements of global mean sea level from NASA, 1993 to 2024. Every value is the change since the 1993 starting point, measured in millimetres.
Global mean sea level change since 1993
| Year | Sea Level Change (mm) |
|---|---|
| 1993 | 0 |
| 1996 | 12 |
| 1999 | 18 |
| 2002 | 28 |
| 2005 | 35 |
| 2008 | 42 |
| 2011 | 50 |
| 2014 | 61 |
| 2017 | 75 |
| 2020 | 88 |
| 2024 | 104 |
Formulas for Part C
- Average Rate
- Average Rate = Total Change ÷ Number of Years
- Future Rise
- Future Rise = Rate × Time Period
Build Your CER Argument
Write your answers in the CLAIM, EVIDENCE, and REASONING boxes on Part C of your worksheet.
Claim
State what is happening to global sea level in one clear sentence.
Evidence
Calculate the rate of change. Compare the early years with the recent years.
Reasoning
Explain thermal expansion and ice melt.
Background
Two things are raising sea level, and both come from a warmer planet.
1. Thermal expansion. When water warms up, its molecules move faster and spread farther apart. The same amount of water takes up more space. The ocean is very deep, so even a small amount of warming adds up to a real rise.
2. Melting land ice. Glaciers and the ice sheets on Greenland and Antarctica sit on top of land. When they melt, that water runs into the ocean and adds volume that was not there before.
Sea ice is different. Sea ice already floats in the ocean, so it already pushes water aside. When it melts, sea level barely changes — the same way a glass of ice water does not overflow when the ice cubes melt.
Think about it: why does ice on land raise sea level when floating ice does not?
Part DAtmospheric CO₂ Concentration
About this dataset
Carbon dioxide concentration at the Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii, measured in parts per million (ppm). These are decade-by-decade values, so each number is an annual average rather than a single monthly reading.
Atmospheric CO₂ at Mauna Loa Observatory, by decade
| Decade | Starting CO₂ (ppm) | Ending CO₂ (ppm) | Increase (ppm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 317 | 326 | 9 |
| 1970s | 326 | 339 | 13 |
| 1980s | 339 | 354 | 15 |
| 1990s | 354 | 369 | 15 |
| 2000s | 369 | 390 | 21 |
| 2010s | 390 | 414 | 24 |
| 2020–2024 | 414 | 422 | 8 (over 4 years) |
Formula for Part D
- Percentage Increase
- Percentage Increase = ((Final − Initial) ÷ Initial) × 100%
Build Your CER Argument
Write your answers in the CLAIM, EVIDENCE, and REASONING boxes on Part D of your worksheet.
Claim
Describe the CO2 trend in one clear sentence.
Evidence
Compare values from different decades. Use the Increase column to show how the rate itself is changing.
Reasoning
Explain the carbon cycle and human impacts.
Background
Carbon moves constantly between the air, the ocean, soil, and living things. This is called the carbon cycle.
Plants pull CO2 out of the air during photosynthesis. Animals breathe CO2 out, and decaying material releases it too. For thousands of years these moved about the same amount of carbon in each direction, so the level in the air stayed fairly steady.
Fossil fuels break that balance. Coal, oil, and natural gas formed from living things that were buried millions of years ago. All of that carbon sat locked underground, out of the cycle.
Burning fossil fuels puts that carbon back into the air in a couple of hundred years — carbon that took millions of years to store away. The natural processes that remove CO2 cannot keep up with that speed.
Think about it: the amount added each decade in the table keeps getting bigger. What does that tell you about how fast we are burning fossil fuels?
Part ESolar System Data from the NYS Reference Tables
About this dataset
Planetary data taken from the NYS Earth Science Reference Tables (ESRT). Keep your ESRT open next to this page — you will use the same table on the Regents exam.
Solar system data from the NYS Earth Science Reference Tables
| Planet | Distance from Sun (million km) | Period of Revolution | Diameter (km) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury | 57.9 | 88 days | 4,879 |
| Venus | 108.2 | 224.7 days | 12,104 |
| Earth | 149.6 | 365.26 days | 12,756 |
| Mars | 228.0 | 1.9 years | 6,792 |
| Jupiter | 778.5 | 11.9 years | 142,984 |
| Saturn | 1432.0 | 29.5 years | 120,536 |
| Uranus | 2867.0 | 83.7 years | 51,118 |
| Neptune | 4515.0 | 163.7 years | 49,528 |
Formulas for Part E
- Distance ratio
- Ratio = Neptune's Distance ÷ Mercury's Distance
- Period ratio
- Ratio = Neptune's Period ÷ Mercury's Period (convert to the same units first)
- Kepler's Third Law
- P2 is proportional to r3 — so cube the distance ratio and square the period ratio, and the two answers should come out about the same.
Build Your CER Argument
Write your answers in the CLAIM, EVIDENCE, and REASONING boxes on Part E of your worksheet.
Claim
State the relationship between distance and revolution period in one clear sentence.
Evidence
Compare at least 3 pairs of planets. Include their specific distances and periods.
Reasoning
Explain using gravitational force and orbital mechanics.
Background
Gravity is what holds a planet in its orbit. The Sun's gravity pulls on every planet, but that pull gets weaker the farther away the planet is.
A planet close to the Sun feels a strong pull, so it has to move fast to stay in orbit. A planet far out feels a weak pull and moves much more slowly.
Distant planets also have much farther to travel to finish one lap. So they lose twice over: a longer path and a slower speed. That is why Neptune takes 163.7 years to go around once while Mercury takes only 88 days.
Kepler's Third Law puts a number on this. The square of a planet's period is proportional to the cube of its distance, written P2 ∝ r3.
Think about it: if you double a planet's distance from the Sun, does its year get twice as long, or more than twice as long?
Part FSynthesis and Connections
About this section
No new data here. Part F asks you to connect the datasets you have already analyzed and to judge somebody else's claim. Switch back to Parts A–E whenever you need to reread a number.
1. Connecting Datasets
Explain how the CO2 data (Part D) relates to the temperature data (Part B). Use specific values from both datasets.
2. Connecting Datasets
How might the temperature changes (Part B) contribute to sea level rise (Part C)? Describe two mechanisms.
3. Critical Thinking: Evaluate a Claim
A student makes this claim:
“The strongest earthquakes always occur at the deepest depths because there's more pressure.”
Using evidence from Part A, write a CER argument that evaluates this claim on your worksheet.
Claim
Do you agree or disagree with the student? Say so in one clear sentence.
Evidence
Pull specific depth and magnitude values from the Part A graph that test the student's claim.
Reasoning
Explain why the data does or does not support the student's idea.
Background
A claim can sound reasonable and still be wrong. The way to test one is to check it against the data.
This student's reasoning is not crazy. Pressure really does increase with depth. But pressure is not the only thing that increases. Temperature goes up too, and heat is what makes rock ductile — able to bend slowly instead of snapping.
A big earthquake needs a large block of brittle rock to break all at once. Deep rock is too hot to do that.
Think about it: on the Part A graph, are the highest magnitudes at the deepest depths, or somewhere else?
Reflection
What was the most surprising pattern you discovered in the data? Why?